Learning Objectives:

1. Critique the effectiveness of the Cutting Movement Assessment Score (CMAS) versus Ground Reaction forces (GRF) as a proxy to identify ACL Injury risk. 2. Describe the Cutting Movement Assessment Score tool procedure. 3. Defend a decision to eliminate the CMAS as a screening tool for identifying anterior cruciate ligament injury risk.

Keywords: ACL; Ground Reaction Force; CMAS; Functional; GPF;